What is a Context Window for Large Language Models?

Imagine telling a friend a long story, only for them to forget the beginning before you reach the punchline. This is similar to what happens when an AI model runs out of short-term memory and must remove earlier information to keep going.

In large language models (LLMs), this limitation is known as the context window.

As AI systems evolve and support larger context sizes, understanding context windows becomes essential for building scalable and reliable applications. In this guide, we explain how AI context windows work, the challenges of expanding them, and the practical strategies used to overcome their limitations.

What Is a Context Window?

The context window of an AI model determines the amount of text it can hold in its working memory while generating a response. It limits how long a conversation can be carried out without forgetting details from earlier interactions.

You can think of it as a human’s short-term memory. It stores information from previous conversations temporarily to use for the task at hand.

Context windows affect various aspects, including the quality of reasoning, the depth of conversation, and the model's ability to personalize responses effectively. It also determines the maximum size of input it can process at once. When a prompt or conversation context exceeds that limit, the model truncates (cuts off) the earliest parts of the text to make room.

To get a clearer picture of what this exactly means, let's look at a few basic concepts underlying AI models and context windows.

‍

Context Window Concepts

Large language models (LLMs) are built on three core concepts that directly shape how an AI context window works: tokenization, the attention mechanism, and positional encoding. Together, these determine how much information a model can process at once, how efficiently it reasons over that information, and where practical memory limits emerge.

Tokenization

Tokenization is the process of converting raw text into smaller units, known as tokens, that an LLM can process. Depending on the tokenizer, a token may represent an entire word, a single character, or a partial word segment. The full collection of tokens a model understands is referred to as its vocabulary.

For example, the sentence “Hello, world” might be tokenized as ["Hello", ",", " world"].

During training and inference, each token is mapped to a unique integer. The model operates on these numerical sequences rather than raw text, learning relationships between tokens and generating output by predicting the most likely next token in the sequence.

Tokenization efficiency has a direct impact on the size of a model’s context window. When text can be represented using fewer tokens, more information fits within the same token limit. Tokenizers that encode common words or phrases as single tokens are particularly effective, as they allow LLMs to handle longer prompts and documents without exceeding context constraints.

Attention Mechanism

The attention mechanism is a foundational component of modern LLMs and is responsible for determining which parts of the input the model should focus on when generating a response.

Rather than treating every token equally, the model evaluates how relevant each token is to the current one. It does this by comparing token representations and assigning weights that determine how much influence each token has on the output.

Attention is built around three elements:

• Queries – Signals sent by the current token to search for relevant information.
• Keys – Identifiers that describe each token and determine how well it matches a query.
• Values – The actual information retrieved when a query matches a key.

The model calculates similarity scores between queries and keys, normalises them using the softmax function, and produces the final output as a weighted combination of the values.

In self-attention, every token is compared against every other token in the sequence. This results in quadratic computational complexity: doubling the context window requires roughly four times the computation and memory. As context windows grow, attention costs scale rapidly, making naïve expansion impractical.

To manage this, modern models rely on optimisations such as sparse attention, low-rank approximations, and chunking strategies to keep computation within feasible limits.

Positional Encoding

Transformers, which power modern LLMs, do not inherently understand the order of tokens. Positional encoding is used to inject information about token order and relative distance into the model.

By adding a positional signal to each token, the model can reason about sequence structure and understand how tokens relate to one another over time. The choice of positional encoding method directly influences how far a model can reliably track relationships, which in turn defines the effective size of its context window.

Common approaches include:

• Absolute Positional Embeddings
  Each position in the sequence has a learned embedding, effectively giving tokens a fixed address. This works well for shorter sequences but does not generalise beyond the lengths seen during training, making context window expansion difficult.
• Sinusoidal Encodings
  Positions are represented using repeating sine and cosine functions. These generalise better to longer sequences than absolute embeddings, though stability can degrade at extreme lengths.
• Relative Positional Encodings
  Instead of encoding exact positions, the model learns the relative distance between tokens. This improves generalisation to longer contexts, though architectural limits still apply.
• Rotary Positional Embeddings (RoPE)
  RoPE encodes position by rotating token vectors based on their location, preserving relative distance information. This approach remains stable as sequence length increases and supports much larger context windows.
• ALiBi (Attention Linear Biases)
  ALiBi introduces a distance-based bias directly into the attention mechanism, naturally prioritising nearby tokens. It scales efficiently and performs well for long-context scenarios.

Evolution of Context Windows

If the context exceeds the context window, the model may truncate or ignore the earliest parts, potentially losing important context. This is why researchers continuously experiment with new techniques to push these limits and enable longer context windows.

Proprietary models

Until 2022, OpenAI’s GPT models dominated the landscape. The first GPT model, released in 2018, supported a 512-token window. The next two versions in 2019 and 2020 each doubled that limit, reaching 2,048 tokens for GPT-3. Successive models kept extending these boundaries to up to one million tokens (GPT-4.1).

Recently, OpenAI was caught up or even outraced by the competition. Google’s Gemini 2.5 and 3 Pro versions match this window size of up to a million tokens, making it possible to process entire books, large codebases, and multi-document workloads in a single pass.

Anthropic’s Claude Sonnet 4.5 series is currently testing the same context window size in beta, expanding from its original size of 200,000 tokens.

Open-source models

Open-source model families like Llama and Mistral generally land in the 100k to 200k range, offering respectable long-context performance while remaining practical to deploy locally or fine-tune.

Notable exceptions include Llama Maverick, which supports a 1 million token window designed for general-purpose reasoning across long documents. Meanwhile, Llama Scout pushes the boundary even further with a massive 10 million token capacity, specifically engineered for processing entire codebases or legal archives in a single pass.

Size vs. precision

However, the release of GPT-5.2 just this week signaled a shift in strategy. Rather than chasing infinite context, OpenAI restricted its newest flagship to a 400,000-token window, trading raw size for 'perfect recall' and superior reasoning capabilities that avoid the distraction issues common in larger models.

The differences in context window size shape how each model performs in real workflows. Extended context windows power models with strong accuracy, coherence, and long-range reasoning, but they also require more computation and more careful context selection.

Mid-range models stay efficient and still manage long documents and extended chats, though they need the right structure for very large inputs.

How Extended Context Windows are Used

With enough room to hold entire reports, transcripts, codebases, or research papers at once, a model can track patterns, connect distant details, and maintain a coherent understanding from start to finish. This offers many fields of application:

• Law: Large windows allow models to analyze full contracts, compare clauses across multiple documents, and track references hidden in long documents.
• Healthcare: Teams can review lengthy clinical guidelines, patient histories, or multi-study datasets while preserving important context that smaller windows would miss.
• Research: A large-window model can read full papers and literature reviews in one pass and surface connections that only appear when the entire document is visible.

Conversational AI

Larger context windows make conversational AI feel more natural because the model can remember more of the conversation without forgetting earlier messages.

In customer service, this leads to smoother and more personalized interactions. The model can use past preferences and earlier conversations to give more accurate and relevant responses.

Multimodal reasoning

Extended context windows support complex reasoning across text, audio, and visuals by giving the model enough space to hold all modalities together instead of processing them in isolation.

When the full transcript, visual frames, and related written material fit inside a single window, the model can compare details across formats, track relationships, and build a unified understanding of the context.

This eliminates the gaps that appear when information must be chunked or summarized and allows the model to reason over the entire set of inputs at once.

Large context windows unlock powerful model capabilities, but they also introduce new performance challenges as input sizes grow. Even advanced models struggle to maintain perfect attention across extremely long sequences, so they don’t always use information from every part of the context as reliably as you’d expect. One common issue in long-context models is the “lost in the middle” effect. Models remember the beginning and end of a long sequence pretty well, but they often miss or ignore important details buried in the middle. This can lead to weaker answers, even when the full context is available. Structuring the input in a smart way helps to avoid this issue for important tasks. This means breaking it into clear sections or repeating key points so the model doesn’t overlook them.

Costs can increase rapidly with an increased context window size. Every additional token increases the size of the attention computation, which raises inference time, GPU memory requirements, and overall system load. To manage this, more effective ways to feed the model information are needed. Techniques such as selective retrieval, hierarchical chunking, or quick summaries help keep the input smaller, so the model isn’t overloaded.

Large windows also introduce concerns regarding safety, security, and privacy. When you give the model more input, there’s a higher chance of exposing sensitive data. That’s why teams need solid data-handling rules, redaction steps, and access controls to make sure large context windows don’t create new risks.

In many cases, unnecessary or loosely related information increases cognitive load for the model, raising the risk of hallucinations and incorrect patterns. Lengthy inputs also introduce noise that can distort the model’s understanding of the task.

In practice, high-quality performance often stems from carefully curated context, ensuring the model sees the right information instead of just being exposed to the biggest amount of information.

Optimizing Context Window Usage

Several methods can be employed to make optimal use of context windows. Among these are Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG), context engineering, chunking, and model selection.

Retrieval Augmented Generation

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) works by pulling additional information from an external database and feeding it to the model whenever context is needed.

Instead of stuffing entire documents into the context window, RAG stores everything separately and only retrieves the pieces that matter for the current question. This keeps the context small while still giving the model all the information it needs.

It does this by using embeddings or vector search to find the most relevant chunks and sending those chunks to the model in a clean, structured way. This increases accuracy by ensuring that the model can use relevant extra information beyond its training data.

Context engineering

Context engineering focuses on giving models relevant information instead of overwhelming them with unnecessary detail. Effective strategies include segmenting long documents, summarizing low-value sections, and using lightweight preprocessing steps to highlight main points.

Semantic search helps here by identifying the text that matters for the current query. You can also improve results by moving the most critical information to the beginning or end of the context, since models tend to remember those spots better.

Chunking and segmentation

Chunking breaks long documents into smaller, coherent sections. The idea is to group content based on its subject matter, structure, or the task it supports.

This keeps each chunk coherent and helps the model stay focused instead of getting lost in a huge block of text. If you want to know more, feel free to check out this article on advanced chunking strategies.

Semantic chunking groups sentences that share a similar meaning instead of cutting the text at random character limits. It splits the content at natural breakpoints like topic shifts, paragraph transitions, or section headers.

Task-based chunking goes even further by shaping each chunk around the specific question you’re trying to answer. Each section then contains only the information that is actually relevant to that task.

Model selection

Tasks that involve full-document analysis, multi-file reasoning, or long-running conversations benefit from models with windows in the 200k–1M range. For more focused tasks like summarization, code review, or short-form question answering, models in the 100k–200k range often provide the best balance of speed, cost, and accuracy.

Smaller windows can still perform well when paired with strong retrieval systems. A good RAG system or Model Context Protocol (MCP) can pull the right information on demand, so the model doesn’t need to hold everything in its memory.

Context Window Trends

Before we wrap up, let’s take a look at where the technology is heading regarding context windows.

Dynamic context windows

Future model architectures are moving toward dynamic context windows, rather than fixed-size windows.

Researchers are exploring approaches that blend transformer strengths with new long-range memory systems, resulting in models that can store and recall information without relying on attention mechanisms only.

These architectures overcome today’s limits by shifting from static context windows to dynamic memory layers that grow with the task.

Context-aware memory systems

Memory systems are another area of innovation. Future models are expected to rely more on context-aware memory systems that extend beyond a single session and provide continuity over time.

Instead of treating each conversation as a fresh start, these systems store key preferences, past decisions, and recurring themes in a structured memory layer that can be recalled when relevant.

This moves personalization from reactive to proactive, allowing the model to understand users more holistically and support long-running goals with far greater consistency.

RAG enhancements

External retrieval is evolving as well. Currently, RAG works like a search engine, pulling relevant text into the prompt. Advanced versions such as Corrective Retrieval-Augmented Generation (CRAG) have already surfaced, but that is just the beginning.

In the future, retrieval will feel more built-in, almost like the model has its own external memory. They will automatically gather, compress, and resurface information with minimal user intervention.

Let's Wrap Up

Larger windows unlock powerful new workflows, yet they also introduce attention challenges, higher computational costs, and quality risks when context is overloaded. This makes strategic context management essential.

Techniques like retrieval augmentation, semantic chunking, and context engineering help models stay focused, efficient, and reliable even as their capacities expand.

Looking ahead, the best LLM-powered systems combine smart tools and a solid understanding of how context affects reasoning. By applying these principles, teams can capture the benefits of long-context models while preparing for the next generation of architectures that push context boundaries even further.